Jump to content
SWVASPORTS.COM

Recommended Posts

Posted

Here is my take on Giles after tonight. We lack speed across the board but we also have the wrong man starting at tailback. In the few plays that the backup tailback got to run the ball you could see a change in the offense because he was able to hit the holes before they closed up. He does have one flaw though and that is ball security. If he can work on that he could be a force from what I’ve seen. I can’t understand why Jeff will not give him a chance. He has a history dating back to 2016 of waiting until halfway through the season to make a change in the backfield. If we do not change something, it could very well be a 1-9 or 2-8 season at best. 

Posted
3 minutes ago, SWVAgridiron said:

GW was expected to be the top dog of 1C, but after watching Radford against WB they still looked like a team that could take 2C despite what they lost. Hopefully a Radford or GW poster can fill us in.

Exactly my take as well from watching them vs Byrd

Posted
On 8/30/2024 at 10:51 PM, Graham32 said:

Is GW just that good or Radford just have a bad game? 

I would say GW is pretty good but Radford did not play to their talent level.  it is yet to see if the sophomore QB can figure out how to slow the game down.  the receivers and he do not have the chemistry that Clark and Kanipe had.   The lack of depth on the line definitely caused issues late in that game.   Some of the key Radford seniors did not step up and lead the team.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...