Jump to content
SWVASPORTS.COM

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, Fairlawncat said:

So, in the case of Union and Glenvar. Number 4 above would be the first application and they would take the average power rating of All ten of Glenvars opponents because all 10 are in Va and they would take the average power rating of 9 of Unions opponents and throw out Daniel Boone. 

Nope... you left out a few...

3. If one played fewer than 10 games.
4. If an opponent played fewer than 10 games.
5. Highest win % vs. rating scale recognized opponents.
6. Highest avg. rating of all of their opponents.
7. Highest avg. rating of all their VA opponents.
8. Highest Region seed.

Glenvar would 'win' on #4, since they played Galax.
 

Had to use #6 a few years ago in 4D... I finished it sometime after 1 am, since they had opponents I  didn't track.

Posted
31 minutes ago, VHSLhelper said:

Nope... you left out a few...

3. If one played fewer than 10 games.
4. If an opponent played fewer than 10 games.
5. Highest win % vs. rating scale recognized opponents.
6. Highest avg. rating of all of their opponents.
7. Highest avg. rating of all their VA opponents.
8. Highest Region seed.

Glenvar would 'win' on #4, since they played Galax.
 

Had to use #6 a few years ago in 4D... I finished it sometime after 1 am, since they had opponents I  didn't track.

Wouldn’t want to go to Glenvar to play in playoffs.   This bunch is rolling averaging around 45 ppg while allowing 3. 

Posted
5 hours ago, Fairlawncat said:

So, in the case of Union and Glenvar. Number 4 above would be the first application and they would take the average power rating of All ten of Glenvars opponents because all 10 are in Va and they would take the average power rating of 9 of Unions opponents and throw out Daniel Boone. 

That’d probably help Union then right??

Posted

Nope, according to Vhslhelp, because Galax, an opponent of Glenvar played 9 games or less, that would actually be 4th on the tie breaker list and would settle it is favor of Glenvar. So, it looks like, if they tie in power rating, Glenvar wins out because Galax played 9 games or less which according to VHSL rules, gives it to Glenvar.

Union and Glenvar won't tie. Union will finish ahead if both go 10 and 0.

Posted
1 hour ago, Fairlawncat said:

Nope, according to Vhslhelp, because Galax, an opponent of Glenvar played 9 games or less, that would actually be 4th on the tie breaker list and would settle it is favor of Glenvar. So, it looks like, if they tie in power rating, Glenvar wins out because Galax played 9 games or less which according to VHSL rules, gives it to Glenvar.

Union and Glenvar won't tie. Union will finish ahead if both go 10 and 0.

Yeah I was just wondering what the rule was in case

  • Union_Fan changed the title to Unofficial Powerpoints after Week 8 - 10/18
Posted

2D

Rank Team Record Total Points Rating
01.) Union 8-0 204 25.5000
02.) Gate City 6-2 173 21.6250
03.) Ridgeview 6-1 150 21.4286
04.) Lebanon 6-1 148 21.1429
05.) Va High 6-2 165 20.6250
06.) Graham 4-3 131 18.7143
07.) Richlands 4-3 128 18.2857
08.) Lee 2-5 101 14.4286
09.) Tazewell 2-5 97 13.8571
10.) John Battle 1-7 100 12.5000
11.) Central-Wise 1-6 87 12.4286
12.) Marion 0-7 69 9.8571

2C

Rank Team Record Total Points Rating
01.) Glenvar 8-0 196 24.5000
02.) Gretna 6-1 164 23.4286
03.) Floyd Co 6-1 153 21.8571
04.) Radford 4-3 135 19.2857
05.) Appomattox 4-3 134 19.1429
06.) James River-B 4-3 130 18.5714
07.) Nelson Co 4-3 118 16.8571
08.) Patrick Co 3-5 127 15.8750
09.) Dan River 3-5 120 15.0000
10.) Liberty-Bed 2-5 103 14.7143
11.) Chatham 3-4 94 13.4286
12.) Martinsville 1-6 94 13.4286

1D

Rank Team Record Total Points Rating
01.) Eastside 8-0 182 22.7500
02.) Chilhowie 6-1 140 20.0000
03.) Rye Cove 5-2 128 18.2857
04.) Northwood 5-2 122 17.4286
05.) Holston 6-2 137 17.1250
06.) Honaker 3-4 111 15.8571
07.) Twin Springs 5-3 124 15.5000
08.) Rural Retreat 3-4 99 14.1429
09.) Thomas Walker 3-4 97 13.8571
10.) Hurley 3-4 93 13.2857
11.) Pat Henry-GS 2-5 90 12.8571
12.) Grundy 2-6 96 12.0000
13.) JI Burton 2-5 78 11.1429
14.) Twin Valley 1-6 56 8.0000
15.) Castlewood 0-7 55 7.8571

1C

Rank Team Record Total Points Rating
01.) Giles 6-1 144 20.5714
02.) Craig Co 7-0 144 20.5714
03.) George Wythe 5-3 140 17.5000
04.) Grayson Co 3-4 111 15.8571
05.) Bath Co 4-2 90 15.0000
06.) Narrows 2-5 102 14.5714
07.) Parry McCluer 4-4 113 14.1250
08.) Auburn 4-4 106 13.2500
09.) Fort Chiswell 1-7 85 10.6250
10.) Galax 0-6 59 9.8333
11.) Bland Co 1-7 78 9.7500
12.) East Mont 1-7 77 9.6250

 

The "Official" points for 1D are giving credit for Tri-Cities Christian with both Hurley and Twin Valley. For Hurley, they gave credit for the win, but not the rider points. For TV, they gave credit for the loss, but then awarded 2 phantom points from somewhere. Who knows how they'll handle TCC's win over Unaka. For now it's not really affecting anything, but if Hurley starts creeping up into that #8 spot it will make a difference.

Posted

Unsure of how the whole Galax situation works, but if Grayson gets points from a forfeit win over Galax, and George Wythe beat Grayson, would it work out so that George Wythe gets two more points from Grayson’s “win” over Galax?

Posted
1 hour ago, MMcMahon26 said:

Unsure of how the whole Galax situation works, but if Grayson gets points from a forfeit win over Galax, and George Wythe beat Grayson, would it work out so that George Wythe gets two more points from Grayson’s “win” over Galax?

Yep. Basically, the forfeit is a loss for Galax and a win for Grayson.

Posted
23 hours ago, Union_Fan said:

The "Official" points for 1D are giving credit for Tri-Cities Christian with both Hurley and Twin Valley. For Hurley, they gave credit for the win, but not the rider points. For TV, they gave credit for the loss, but then awarded 2 phantom points from somewhere. Who knows how they'll handle TCC's win over Unaka. For now it's not really affecting anything, but if Hurley starts creeping up into that #8 spot it will make a difference.

For Twin Valley, the "official" points are giving them 4 rider points against Montcalm rather than 2 (in other words, the rider points are calculated as if they beat 2-win Montcalm rather than lost). It won't affect anything, but that is where the phantom 2 points come from.

How are you calculating Hurley's total points? I have them at 89. 64 base points and 25 rider points. 

(W)Bland (1 win) = 2. (L)Eastside (8 wins) = 8. (L)River View (3 wins) = 3. (L)Holston (6 wins) = 6. (W)Burton (2 wins) = 4. (L)Grundy (2 wins) = 2. Not giving them any rider points for TCC. What have I messed up? I have everything else identical to you (other than Twin Valley having 2 total points). 

Posted
11 minutes ago, Cavaholic21 said:

For Twin Valley, the "official" points are giving them 4 rider points against Montcalm rather than 2 (in other words, the rider points are calculated as if they beat 2-win Montcalm rather than lost). It won't affect anything, but that is where the phantom 2 points come from.

How are you calculating Hurley's total points? I have them at 89. 64 base points and 25 rider points. 

(W)Bland (1 win) = 2. (L)Eastside (8 wins) = 8. (L)River View (3 wins) = 3. (L)Holston (6 wins) = 6. (W)Burton (2 wins) = 4. (L)Grundy (2 wins) = 2. Not giving them any rider points for TCC. What have I messed up? I have everything else identical to you (other than Twin Valley having 2 total points). 

The official points are screwed up around TCC because TCC only plays 3 games of 11 man football. The rest are 8 man games.

So, if 1D is going to count TCC then Hurley should get 16 pts for beating a 1A school and 4 rider points for TCC's 2 wins over TV and Unaka.

TV should get 4 pts for losing to a 1A school and 2 points for TCC's 2 wins.

It's like they're counting TCC for base points, but not rider points.

However, whoever is keeping track of 1D's points is not calculating something correctly. I've looked over it 4 times.

  • Union_Fan changed the title to Unofficial Powerpoints after Week 9 - 10/25
Posted

2D

Rank Team Record Total Points Rating
01.) Union 8-0 210 26.2500
02.) Ridgeview 7-1 184 23.0000
03.) Gate City 6-2 180 22.5000
04.) Va High 6-2 172 21.5000
05.) Graham 5-3 163 20.3750
06.) Lebanon 6-2 163 20.3750
07.) Richlands 5-3 154 19.2500
08.) Lee 3-5 123 15.3750
09.) Tazewell 2-6 111 13.8750
10.) John Battle 1-7 101 12.6250
11.) Central-Wise 1-7 99 12.3750
12.) Marion 0-8 80 10.0000

 

1D

Rank Team Record Total Points Rating
01.) Eastside 9-0 208 23.1111
02.) Chilhowie 7-1 175 21.8750
03.) Rye Cove 5-3 146 18.2500
04.) Northwood 6-2 145 18.1250
05.) Holston 6-2 143 17.8750
06.) Honaker 4-4 137 17.1250
07.) Twin Springs 5-3 131 16.3750
08.) Rural Retreat 3-5 114 14.2500
09.) Thomas Walker 3-5 111 13.8750
10.) Grundy 3-6 121 13.4444
11.) Hurley 3-5 106 13.2500
12.) Pat Henry-GS 2-6 101 12.6250
13.) JI Burton 3-5 96 12.0000
14.) Twin Valley 1-6 58 8.2857
15.) Castlewood 0-8 64 8.0000

 

2C

Rank Team Record Total Points Rating
01.) Glenvar 9-0 224 24.8889
02.) Gretna 7-1 193 24.1250
03.) Floyd Co 7-1 188 23.5000
04.) Appomattox 5-3 156 19.5000
05.) Radford 4-4 153 19.1250
06.) James River-B 4-4 145 18.1250
07.) Dan River 4-5 149 16.5556
08.) Patrick Co 3-6 146 16.2222
09.) Nelson Co 4-4 129 16.1250
10.) Liberty-Bed 2-6 121 15.1250
11.) Martinsville 1-7 111 13.8750
12.) Chatham 3-5 108 13.5000

 

1C

Rank Team Record Total Points Rating
01.) Craig Co 8-0 168 21.0000
02.) Giles 6-2 159 19.8750
03.) Grayson Co 4-4 144 18.0000
04.) George Wythe 6-3 161 17.8889
05.) Narrows 3-5 124 15.5000
06.) Bath Co 4-3 104 14.8571
07.) Parry McCluer 4-4 115 14.3750
08.) Auburn 4-4 110 13.7500
09.) Fort Chiswell 2-7 106 11.7778
10.) Galax 0-7 74 10.5714
11.) Bland Co 1-7 83 10.3750
12.) East Mont 1-8 86 9.5556

 

Posted
50 minutes ago, Union_Fan said:

2D

Rank Team Record Total Points Rating
01.) Union 8-0 210 26.2500
02.) Ridgeview 7-1 184 23.0000
03.) Gate City 6-2 180 22.5000
04.) Va High 6-2 172 21.5000
05.) Graham 5-3 163 20.3750
06.) Lebanon 6-2 163 20.3750
07.) Richlands 5-3 154 19.2500
08.) Lee 3-5 123 15.3750
09.) Tazewell 2-6 111 13.8750
10.) John Battle 1-7 101 12.6250
11.) Central-Wise 1-7 99 12.3750
12.) Marion 0-8 80 10.0000

 

1D

Rank Team Record Total Points Rating
01.) Eastside 9-0 208 23.1111
02.) Chilhowie 7-1 175 21.8750
03.) Rye Cove 5-3 146 18.2500
04.) Northwood 6-2 145 18.1250
05.) Holston 6-2 143 17.8750
06.) Honaker 4-4 137 17.1250
07.) Twin Springs 5-3 131 16.3750
08.) Rural Retreat 3-5 114 14.2500
09.) Thomas Walker 3-5 111 13.8750
10.) Grundy 3-6 121 13.4444
11.) Hurley 3-5 106 13.2500
12.) Pat Henry-GS 2-6 101 12.6250
13.) JI Burton 3-5 96 12.0000
14.) Twin Valley 1-6 58 8.2857
15.) Castlewood 0-8 64 8.0000

 

2C

Rank Team Record Total Points Rating
01.) Glenvar 9-0 224 24.8889
02.) Gretna 7-1 193 24.1250
03.) Floyd Co 7-1 188 23.5000
04.) Appomattox 5-3 156 19.5000
05.) Radford 4-4 153 19.1250
06.) James River-B 4-4 145 18.1250
07.) Dan River 4-5 149 16.5556
08.) Patrick Co 3-6 146 16.2222
09.) Nelson Co 4-4 129 16.1250
10.) Liberty-Bed 2-6 121 15.1250
11.) Martinsville 1-7 111 13.8750
12.) Chatham 3-5 108 13.5000

 

1C

Rank Team Record Total Points Rating
01.) Craig Co 8-0 168 21.0000
02.) Giles 6-2 159 19.8750
03.) Grayson Co 4-4 144 18.0000
04.) George Wythe 6-3 161 17.8889
05.) Narrows 3-5 124 15.5000
06.) Bath Co 4-3 104 14.8571
07.) Parry McCluer 4-4 115 14.3750
08.) Auburn 4-4 110 13.7500
09.) Fort Chiswell 2-7 106 11.7778
10.) Galax 0-7 74 10.5714
11.) Bland Co 1-7 83 10.3750
12.) East Mont 1-8 86 9.5556

 

Can Graham make it to 3rd to avoid them in second rd??

Posted
2 minutes ago, goose111874 said:

Can Graham make it to 3rd to avoid them in second rd??

Gonna have to play them to get out of the region imo, so it really doesn’t matter when you see them. Personally, I’d rather have them in round 2 vs round 3.

Posted
Just now, sup_rbeast said:

Graham isn’t going to lose in 2D unless Union beats them. Thats just my opinion, but I think that will prove to be true.

Probably not but someone like GC with they’re style of play could 

Posted
4 minutes ago, Unchained said:

If it's at Legion Field it could be interesting:)

I think there is a sizeable gulf between Union and Graham and then everyone else. IMO Union has the best team in the region, but they have to prove it come playoff time. I think Graham is close enough to Union to beat them, but unless Union just goes out and lays an egg I don’t see anyone else in the Region beating them. Same for Graham. Unless GC has something they are yet to show, I don’t think they have anything for Graham regardless of where is played.

Posted
Just now, sup_rbeast said:

I think there is a sizeable gulf between Union and Graham and then everyone else. IMO Union has the best team in the region, but they have to prove it come playoff time. I think Graham is close enough to Union to beat them, but unless Union just goes out and lays an egg I don’t see anyone else in the Region beating them. Same for Graham.

I think if we see Graham again it will be a low-scoring dogfight, but I love our depth and as the game goes on if it's tight, edge to Union in the 4th.

Posted
Just now, Unchained said:

I think if we see Graham again it will be a low-scoring dogfight, but I love our depth and as the game goes on if it's tight, edge to Union in the 4th.

IMO Union is the team that will beat Union if they lose. If they play their best game every single week, I think they are good enough this year to make a run to the finals. At that point who knows. I’m not saying Union can’t lose, I’m saying that if they do, it will be no one but themselves to blame. I’m not sure this is the best team Union has had, but they are pretty good…and if they can avoid complacency and settling for “good enough”, this is the year they can put it all together.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...