Jump to content
SWVASPORTS.COM

Recommended Posts

Posted

Dawyot is the biggest kid on the DL. It appears that the other DE, #53, was badly injured against Radford. Carted off the field and didn't play against Gretna.

The 2 DTs are small, but quick with great technique. The defense isn't impenetrable, like Graham's last year, but they are quick to the ball and good tacklers.

#53 was used in the backfield as a lead blocker for Dawyot. He was replaced by a linebacker at DE.

Haven't gotten a chance to look over the offensive line much, but #69 is DT and on the OL.

Posted

Their OL and DL are inferior to Unions. Told you all that in week 1. Does that mean they automatically lose? Of course not, because their QB is superior to any player on the field (minus the DE from Union-Anderson). 

Can the Glenvar QB and offensive scheme overcome Unions DL and OL advantage (and if you dont think its an advantage, you are nuts)? Thats the question. I also think this is why the games is a tossup. Glenvar may be able to do it. They might not.

Glenvars WRs are special. Great route runners, don't drop passes, smooth as silk. By the way, Glenvars OL and DL are Very good as well. But their OL and DL is not as good as Union's. 

Mark this one down. Keep your eyes on Anderson for Union. Glenvar has a nightmare matchup trying to block him. He is the kind of kid thst could flip the game by causing pressure on Dawyot and fumbles/sacks on Glenvar if not careful. If Glenvar just partially contains Anderson, thats a huge plus for Glenvar. If you see Anderson living in the backfield early on and causing major disruption, Glenvar is in trouble. If you see Anderson fairly well contained early on and not having major disruptions, Union is in a mess and is going to have a bad day.

Posted
54 minutes ago, SWVAgridiron said:

As good as Ridgeview but not as good as Graham or Union IMO 

As good as Ridgeview might be enough because unlike Ridgeview, Glenvar has a superior passing game. If Ridgeview had a decent passing game, they might have pulled the win against Union. It will be a great battle in the semis.

Posted
6 minutes ago, Fairlawncat said:

Their OL and DL are inferior to Unions. Told you all that in week 1. Does that mean they automatically lose? Of course not, because their QB is superior to any player on the field (minus the DE from Union-Anderson). 

Can the Glenvar QB and offensive scheme overcome Unions DL and OL advantage (and if you dont think its an advantage, you are nuts)? Thats the question. I also think this is why the games is a tossup. Glenvar may be able to do it. They might not.

Glenvars WRs are special. Great route runners, don't drop passes, smooth as silk. By the way, Glenvars OL and DL are Very good as well. But their OL and DL is not as good as Union's. 

Mark this one down. Keep your eyes on Anderson for Union. Glenvar has a nightmare matchup trying to block him. He is the kind of kid thst could flip the game by causing pressure on Dawyot and fumbles/sacks on Glenvar if not careful. If Glenvar just partially contains Anderson, thats a huge plus for Glenvar. If you see Anderson living in the backfield early on and causing major disruption, Glenvar is in trouble. If you see Anderson fairly well contained early on and not having major disruptions, Union is in a mess and is going to have a bad day.

They have to worry about Polier as well. Kid is getting scary good and is only a soph.

Posted

Ridgeview dedicated 2 guys to spy Chandler, or so I was told, and he still rushed for over 100 yards.

Just from what I've seen, Glenvar doesn't have anyone as big and dominant as Scanlon on the DL to pick up that slack, so they can't afford to dedicate 2 guys to spy Chandler.

That's why I keep going back to Glenvar's OL vs Union's DL to be the difference in the game.

Haven't watched enough film to judge which way that battle will go.

Posted
13 minutes ago, Gridiron60 said:

As good as Ridgeview might be enough because unlike Ridgeview, Glenvar has a superior passing game. If Ridgeview had a decent passing game, they might have pulled the win against Union. It will be a great battle in the semis.

Ridgeview was WELL prepared for Saturday's rematch, but they were not prepared at all the 1st go around.

I'm hoping the same thing for Glenvar except they won't get a rematch.

Of course, neither will Union, so they gotta get it right the first time.

Posted

 Union cannot play usual 7-9 yards soft coverage. Their DBs are very comfortable in a soft zone and never turning their hips or playing tight. Ever notice how all their picks are reading QB and hips facing the QB?  Glenvar has a dude that will punish you with 6-8 yard outs and 10-12 yard comebacks. 
I’ve talked about the odd choice of outside leverage and playing soft.  Edwards better stop that shit before a quick slant or skinny post goes the distance. A well thrown ball and a well ran route CAN’T be covered. Even the best NFL DBs can’t do it. 
Also, Glenvar QB has no problem stepping up in the pocket and can run.  Andersons weakness is he likes to go wide around the OT…gets upfield a bit. Union has to watch QB draws and taking off up the middle.  QB isn’t going to be scared of Anderson or Pollier….because he is just as big or bigger. Kid is 6’5”, 220lbs and plays with an attitude. Plus they move him around the pocket really well. 
They run some good mesh concepts and they use two split RBs as additional pass blockers and run 2-3 routes.  They will run deep routes and seem to have confidence their pass protection will hold up. I didn’t see check downs to the RBs much…His feet are his most used check down and his is a willing and very capable runner. 
Ole #2 for Union might have to actually tackle someone this week. 😂

Posted
14 hours ago, Fairlawncat said:

Their OL and DL are inferior to Unions. Told you all that in week 1. Does that mean they automatically lose? Of course not, because their QB is superior to any player on the field (minus the DE from Union-Anderson). 

Can the Glenvar QB and offensive scheme overcome Unions DL and OL advantage (and if you dont think its an advantage, you are nuts)? Thats the question. I also think this is why the games is a tossup. Glenvar may be able to do it. They might not.

Glenvars WRs are special. Great route runners, don't drop passes, smooth as silk. By the way, Glenvars OL and DL are Very good as well. But their OL and DL is not as good as Union's. 

Mark this one down. Keep your eyes on Anderson for Union. Glenvar has a nightmare matchup trying to block him. He is the kind of kid thst could flip the game by causing pressure on Dawyot and fumbles/sacks on Glenvar if not careful. If Glenvar just partially contains Anderson, thats a huge plus for Glenvar. If you see Anderson living in the backfield early on and causing major disruption, Glenvar is in trouble. If you see Anderson fairly well contained early on and not having major disruptions, Union is in a mess and is going to have a bad day.

I'm confused on your stance on how the lines stack up???

Posted
12 minutes ago, BoBob said:

I'm confused on your stance on how the lines stack up???

It’s okay, you’re not the only one. 😂 Lebanon threw for well over 200+ yards on Union and no offense but their line is not good at all. Unless Union can pressure Dawyot, I can see Glenvar racking up the passing yards. I’m not saying that means Glenvar wins but I won’t be surprised whichever comes out victorious. 

Posted
14 hours ago, Fairlawncat said:

Their OL and DL are inferior to Unions. Told you all that in week 1. Does that mean they automatically lose? Of course not, because their QB is superior to any player on the field (minus the DE from Union-Anderson). 

Can the Glenvar QB and offensive scheme overcome Unions DL and OL advantage (and if you dont think its an advantage, you are nuts)? Thats the question. I also think this is why the games is a tossup. Glenvar may be able to do it. They might not.

Glenvars WRs are special. Great route runners, don't drop passes, smooth as silk. By the way, Glenvars OL and DL are Very good as well. But their OL and DL is not as good as Union's. 

Mark this one down. Keep your eyes on Anderson for Union. Glenvar has a nightmare matchup trying to block him. He is the kind of kid thst could flip the game by causing pressure on Dawyot and fumbles/sacks on Glenvar if not careful. If Glenvar just partially contains Anderson, thats a huge plus for Glenvar. If you see Anderson living in the backfield early on and causing major disruption, Glenvar is in trouble. If you see Anderson fairly well contained early on and not having major disruptions, Union is in a mess and is going to have a bad day.

Now that this match up has become a reality you have certainly changed your tone from "NO ONE is beating Union at Bullitt park" and "Union will run all over Glenvar" to the game is now a "toss up"...just an observation....but what has transpired since those statements to make you change your tune so drastically?

Posted
22 minutes ago, Gridiron60 said:

It’s okay, you’re not the only one. 😂 Lebanon threw for well over 200+ yards on Union and no offense but their line is not good at all. Unless Union can pressure Dawyot, I can see Glenvar racking up the passing yards. I’m not saying that means Glenvar wins but I won’t be surprised whichever comes out victorious. 

That was a huge mistake that I hope the Bears don't make against Glenvar. They played the pass in the first half, and didn't really attempt to rush Reece. They started rushing him in the 2nd half and it made a huge difference. Lebanon didn't score after the 1st half.

Union has to pressure Dawyot. That is an absolute must.

Posted
1 hour ago, memorex said:

Now that this match up has become a reality you have certainly changed your tone from "NO ONE is beating Union at Bullitt park" and "Union will run all over Glenvar" to the game is now a "toss up"...just an observation....but what has transpired since those statements to make you change your tune so drastically?

And I stand by the statement. I still believe the matchup is a toss up and still believe nobody is beating Union at Bullitt Park and that Union will run all over Glenvar

As for your question, nothing has transpired. Same pick, same stance. Because I feel Union will run all over Glenvar and that nobody will win at Bullitt Park Does Not Equate to Union "blowing out" Glenvar. That is where you made the leep.

Lastly, the matchup Always was a reality. I told you that in week 1. Union isn't losing to Graham this year and Glenvar isn't losing in Glenvar at home in my opinion.

Posted

Gotta break down, get hands on him. He moves well and can extend plays. Wr's do well running back to the ball and getting open, if there's time.  Their run game isn't fancy, but efficient inside/ outside zone, trap, read option.  Still think Reece is the better playmaker but very close to the same level. Comparing schedules, point-wise very similar, but opponents and being tested in tough games (gc,Graham x2,rv x2, 6-0 Lebanon before injury bug) might go a little more to Union favor.  Region c  is glenvar, then everyone else fighting for 2nd. Gretna, rad, appo, Floyd, all seem kind of middle of the pack. Floyd could've/should've vs glenvar. Seemed to move the ball well 1st half but defense didn't hold up very well.  Discipline wasn't there, got out of position, poor tackling vs great consistent effort from glenvar that never seemed to panic even when qb went out.  2 teams with a lot of similarities will be a good one.  This one imo, will be a better game than title game. 

Posted

Watching Glenvar in person I believe Union is gonna have to go all out on D in putting Dawyot on the ground, If Union plays conservative or drops extra D backs in coverage then Dawyot will rack up big numbers. Sell out on putting him on his back. He makes great reads and even better throws.  Union has the players to do so. If he gets going it will be tough for Union to keep up. Good luck Bears !!!

Posted
25 minutes ago, Weatherman said:

Poquoson has one of the best lineman in America. Is an Alabama lean. Only a junior.

Posted
On 12/4/2025 at 3:21 PM, jeffro said:

Watching Glenvar in person I believe Union is gonna have to go all out on D in putting Dawyot on the ground, If Union plays conservative or drops extra D backs in coverage then Dawyot will rack up big numbers. Sell out on putting him on his back. He makes great reads and even better throws.  Union has the players to do so. If he gets going it will be tough for Union to keep up. Good luck Bears !!!

No one ever listens to me☹️

Posted
1 hour ago, jeffro said:

No one ever listens to me☹️

I do Jeffro, I do. I watched their film and didn’t see them as a weakness at all.  But the Union folk take great pride in their OL/DL and run game, as they should.  But, it often renders them unable to acknowledge other teams can be good at it as well or that other teams are physical, too. 

Posted
On 12/5/2025 at 11:31 AM, Fairlawncat said:

Poquoson has one of the best lineman in America. Is an Alabama lean. Only a junior.

Man, I wish they’d go to VT or UVA…all the good VA players leave.  It’s a shame.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...