scores and info from pulaski scrimmages

[zack 10]

covington 8 tazewell 7

brookville 26 rockbridge 21

radford 14 covington 0

rockbridge 12 pulaski 7

radford 17 covington 7

pulaski 30 brookville 6

 

pulaski much improved passing.

kicking game solid.

brookville was weak on defense,could not stop pass or run.did not look reday to play insecond game.

brookville and rockbridge both have athletes

[zack 10]

radford looked solid to me-i expect them to be much improved!

pulaski scored the first time they had the ball against both teams, mostly running.in the first game , they then were shutdown by rockbridge, and rockbridge dominated the rest of the way.brookville had several big plays against rockbridge to jump out to a 26-7 lead and rockbridge came back late.pulaski moved the ball mainly with the pass after the first possession,moving it at will. they had a long pass and a long run against brookville for a touchdown. brookville looked tired and beat in that second game. with scrimmages,you just cant tell everything.brookville number 21 was a solid runner, breaking a 65 yard run against pulaski.pulaski had several penalties, especially motion penalties.

overall assessment of teams-

pulaski looked very good overall-solid runnning game,solid kicking game, and they showed resolve to work on that passing game in the second game-what i did not know was was i seeing a pulaski passing game that was moving the ball like this or was brookville making mistakes.rockbridge seemed to know how to defend better.

rockbridge has several athletes, have a makings of a good team,this team might be better than last year!

brookville was inconsistent,but you expect that in scrimmages-they do have talent-very tall receivers and some team speed.defense needs work.

radford was well coached, not very many players but knew where to be on offense and defense,also a solid kicking game.

covin

gton could be a playoff team if they dont turn the ball over-they had good sise and some talent.

tazewell needs some work!