Live free or Die

[bucfan64 309]

Live Free or Die

 

 

Already this year, the “Live Free or Die†state of New Hampshire, has taken several very bold stands against the United States Federal Government.

 

The first is House Concurrent Resolution (HCR) 0001 1 for 2009, which urges Congress to withdraw the United States from the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America.

 

For those who didn’t know, President Bush met with the leaders of Canada and Mexico in 2005, and signed the SPPP treaty, presumably paving the way for the North American Union.

 

Of the Main Stream Media, only CNN’s Lou Dobbs took notice, and reported it to the general public.

 

The resolution goes on to say: “Whereas, the gradual creation of such a North American Union from a merger of the United States, Mexico, and Canada would be a direct threat to the Constitution and national independence of the United States, and imply an eventual end to national borders within North America;â€

 

Another resolution, HCR 0010 2, goes further by urging congress to withdraw the United States from the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) by first citing: “Whereas, millions of jobs have been lost by Americans due to the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) since it was approved by Congress and signed by President Bill Clinton in 1993;â€

 

It then points out specifically that it wasn’t a free trade agreement at all, but a major step forward in creating the New World Order, by quoting Henry Kissinger and Robert Pastor directly: “Whereas, Henry A. Kissinger wrote in the Los Angeles Times for July 18, 1993, regarding NAFTA: “What Congress will have before it is not a conventional trade agreement but the architecture of a new international system; and Whereas, Robert Pastor wrote in the January/February 2004 issue of Foreign Affairs: “NAFTA was merely the first draft of an economic constitution for North Americaâ€.

 

However, these aside, HCR0006 3 is the boldest declaration of all. Titled “A RESOLUTION affirming States’ rights based on Jeffersonian principlesâ€, it officially places the Federal Government on notice that the state of New Hampshire will no longer sit idly by while its states rights and the rights of its citizens are eroded by unlawful legislation from the Congress, the President or the Federal Judiciary. HCR 0006 reaffirms its state constitution, and its objectives for joining the “Several States†in forming the union.

 

It then states: “That the several States composing the United States of America, are not united on the principle of unlimited submission to their General Government; but that, by a compact under the style and title of a Constitution for the United States, and of amendments thereto, they constituted a General Government for special purposes, -- delegated to that government certain definite powers, reserving, each State to itself, the residuary mass of right to their own self-government“.

 

The resolution explains further: “That the Constitution of the United States, having delegated to Congress a power to punish treason, counterfeiting the securities and current coin of the United States, piracies, and felonies committed on the high seas, and offences against the law of nations, slavery, and no other crimes whatsoever;â€

 

Finally, the resolution declares that upon the next unconstitutional act of any branch of the federal Government, New Hampshire will consider it a breach of contract, and dissolve the Federal Government entirely: “That any Act by the Congress of the United States, Executive Order of the President of the United States of America or Judicial Order by the Judicatories of the United States of America which assumes a power not delegated to the government of United States of America by the Constitution for the United States of America and which serves to diminish the liberty of the any of the several States or their citizens shall constitute a nullification of the Constitution for the United States of America by the government of the United States of Americaâ€

 

For which several specific examples are cited in the body of the resolution Directly:. “Acts which would cause such a nullification include, but are not limited to:

I. Establishing martial law or a state of emergency within one of the States comprising the United States of America without the consent of the legislature of that State.

II. Requiring involuntary servitude, or governmental service other than a draft during a declared war, or pursuant to, or as an alternative to, incarceration after due process of law.

III. Requiring involuntary servitude or governmental service of persons under the age of 18 other than pursuant to, or as an alternative to, incarceration after due process of law.

IV. Surrendering any power delegated or not delegated to any corporation or foreign government.

V. Any act regarding religion; further limitations on freedom of political speech; or further limitations on freedom of the press.

VI. Further infringements on the right to keep and bear arms including prohibitions of type or quantity of arms or ammunition;â€

 

And if the afore mentioned declaration of nullification was in anyway misunderstood – they reiterated: That should any such act of Congress become law or Executive Order or Judicial Order be put into force, all powers previously delegated to the United States of America by the Constitution for the United States shall revert to the several States individually. Any future government of the United States of America shall require ratification of three quarters of the States seeking to form a government of the United States of America and shall not be binding upon any State not seeking to form such a government;

 

New Hampshire has not forgotten the principles of Freedom on which this country was founded, even if most of the Federal Government has. We must all work to get our own state legislatures to enact similar resolutions, if they haven’t already.

 

References:

1) http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/legislation/2009/HCR0001.html

2) http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/legislation/2009/HCR0010.html

3) http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/legislation/2009/HCR0006.html

[buzzsawBeaver 12]

new hampshire's long been 1 of those states that people suggest would be the 1st to rebel against or the last stronghold against a government of the people, in my opinion wv wouldn't be to far behind.

 

Va I'm not so certain about, unfortunately for va., you all have the big city populations of northern va. dictating a lot of va.'s ways for the state. Eastern va. is certain a huge population base to and perhaps even higher with richmond considered in that, but I'm honestly not so certain how liberal the norfolk., va beach areas lean.