County boy

Well they are a 2A school masquerading as a 1A

I was gonna post something but this is pretty darned good.  Galax can beat them, though.

I'm not sure about the statement, "who gets all the pub."  <--------That's your statement.  The poster made an observation that the player was good and wanted to see him get more touches.  It could be a parent, but it could also not be a parent.  The jest wasn't about being undefeated.  It hinted at how Narrows could possibly be better and to assume a team that's undefeated can't get better is not a good one.  Do you think Galax will care if Narrows is "undefeated" if or when the two meet?  If you are a Narrows fan, you better damn sure hope you get better and 10-0 isn't cutting it, they better improve because Galax is the real deal.  So, the bar isn't necessarily being undefeated, it's getting better.  At the end of the year and the final 15th game, sure, undefeated matters then and winning that 15th game matters, but prior to that game, improvement matters much.  Like I wrote before and will write it again, Polier is NOT getting enough carries right now at Union.  I wrote it after the Graham game.  I wrote this after the Richlands-GC game in week one that The Richlands RB is not getting enough touches at RB and I think just by observation, Webb needs more carries also.  It doesn't mean I'm right.  II could be 100% wrong, but it's just an observation and opinion.
7-0 and "complaining."  The word "complaining" is your very own word.  The poster never "complained."  He made an observation about how he felt Narrows could improve and you and me and EVERY fan of every team does that at every game with the conversation they are having with the person setting beside them in some form or fashion.  Desiring improvement and giving one's opinion is not complaining.  One final thing I keep reading and you implied this also.  "It sounds like something a parent would do or it sounds like it might be the player's parent."  So what?  What if it were?  I don't think it is, but so what?  What if it were?  That STILL does not necessarily make the posters statement untrue.  There is a very real possibility that maybe, just maybe, Narrows getting the kid more touches in the passing game might.....maybe help.  It does not matter where the statement came from.  Looking at last night in a tight game at the half, and then Narrows opening up the passing game and getting the kid the ball in the second half to pull away gives evidence that.....maybe....just maybe....the poster actually might have been right.

A little late is kind of what the poster was getting at with his original post.  I think he was kind of saying he should have been mentioned a little bit before last night and it appears, he was right.  All in all, I took his post originally not as a parent or someone disgruntled.  I read it as a fan who saw what he thought was a solid player and he commented on it and stated that maybe the dude should get some more touches.  That was the jest of his post aside from him being called a liar, one of the parents, etc.  At the end of the day, the poster was right. The player he's talking about (I haven't seen Narrows) evidently is pretty good.  
I wrote this on here a while back which is similar.  Polier against Graham.  I watched it.  I wrote I think they need to get that kid even more touches on offense and that he shouldn't be splitting as many carries.  I wrote because I saw what I thought was a stud.  I'm not his daddy or his friend or family member or live in Big Stone Gap or Appalachia.  It was just an observation.  I was still "letting the coaches coach" LOL, as some love to write.  I think the guy who commented on the Narrows player was no different and simply making an observation and he got hammered for it only to be able to serve a touch of crow a bit later.

No sorry I'm neither just saw a couple videos on facebook. Looking back at the scores Narrows dont put alot of points up,just wondering why with a receiver like that looks like they would score more.

Who is this # 24, I would throw that kid the ball a little more. The Narrows offense needs to do a better job of getting the ball to players who can make plays.

And no I'm not related to anyone  on the narrows team I'm going on what I saw from the games ive watched. The holston game was what i was referring to. If there was 2 more minutes left in that game narrows would have a big L.

Never said I was unhappy, but they only score 3 TDS a game, they should and can score alot more if they use the right playes and they are not if 1 of your top 2 offence threats only gets the ball 3 times a game.

3 that I have heard, not sure how long

I don’t remember anyone hating other than one Narrows guy posing as a Giles fan and newbies like you. And a few talking about the weak schedule that they play. And Narrows was predicted by most to win. My hats off to the Wave, they shut the single wing down and ended the streak. That’s all that really needs to be said.

Thank You! The band works really hard and have really good leadership. “What’s the football team doing on the band field”?