bucfan64

Will feature both girls and boys game. Event begins at 5:00 pm with a youth game, followed by the All Star Girls game followed by the boys game. Richlands Middle School Gym

View my blog http://newagepatriot.blogspot.com/

Hopefully, this is a positive sign, but common sense tells me that excessive spending will NOT cure the problem. HOpefully, some folks made some money back today that they had lost in the previous weeks and months. ////////////// HONG KONG (AP) - World stock markets soared Thursday, with Hong Kong's benchmark vaulting more than 7 percent, as stronger-than-expected U.S. economic figures boosted confidence the world's largest economy is on the mend. Huge gains in Asia and a strong open in Europe followed an overnight surge on Wall Street and extended last month's rebound in world equity markets amid tentative signs of stabilization in the hard-hit global economy and banking industry. It came as Group of 20 leaders met in London for a summit that aims to hammer out policies to combat the economic slump and reform the global financial system.

Let me know when Bush took away ANY OF OUR RIGHTS! Not one single right was taken away from an American Citizen during the Bush Administration, NOT ONE!

for more information visit the link below http://www.newagepatriot.homestead.com

Visit the link below for more information. Email and post the link anywhere and everywhere. We've got some work to do.............. http://www.newagepatriot.homestead.com

Very little will change with Grundy wrestling competing in the BDD. Although the BDD has no wrestling teams, Grundy will win the BDD about as easily as they have won the SWD for the past 25 years. On a serious note, Coach Rowe will have a difficult time finding games for Grundy. Although, there are plenty of Single A schools to choose from, many will shun Grundy for a while because they "just moved down." Despite the fact that they have been the same size as most of the Single A competition ...............

I am in the process of organizing a SWVA TEA PARTY. If you are interested in helping coordinate the event please let me know. Either post here or drop me a PM. The event will be NON PARTISAN and politicians WILL NOT be allowed to speak. They are more than welcome to come and listen but this is for the people and by the people. Basically if you feel that our country is on the wrong path and that the principles of our Founding Fathers- Liberty, Smaller Government and Personal Responsibility have been lost. Then this rally will be for you. We will not be affiliated with any organization. It is our goal to create an event to unify, energize and motivate the silent majority who feel it is time to reclaim our government, stop careless Washington spending and re-instill the principles of our founding fathers. This is NOT AN ANTI-OBAMA rally, this isn't about one man or one political party this is about OUR LEADERS in Washington regardless of political affiliation. The website will be up soon..........http://www.newagepatriot.homestead.com

THE GUY is dressed up like Thomas Paine. Ironically enough, this man was called to the White House to have a meeting with the President the other day. WorldNetDaily is reporting that Bob Basso, who has released videos urging Americans take their government back from corrupt politicians, was reportedly “summoned to the White House by President Obama to discuss the subject matter of the short films.†featured stories Popular Anti Stimulus Video Blogger Summoned to White House Obama featured stories Popular Anti Stimulus Video Blogger Summoned to White House In the video below, Basso, who portrays Thomas Paine, author of the “Common Sense†pamphlet that made the case for independence during the American Revolution, has called for Americans to send tea bags to Congress. Basso strongly criticizes Congress for approving the “largest spending bill in history without reading it†and takes Americans to task because “you did nothing.†The video, “We The People Stimulus Package,†has over a million views. Basso is a former award winning news director for NBC TV and visiting professor at UCLA. He was scheduled to appear on the Jerry Doyle radio show but canceled after Obama had personally invited him to meet in the White House “to discuss the disturbing nature of the videos,†according to WND.

Thanks for the link, this just goes to show you......... Just Like I said in a previous post, IT WAS PERFECTLY fine for the Dems and the LEFT to compare Bush to HITLER but God forbid that anyone compare SAVIOR OBAMA to anything other than the Lord himself. I have studied Political Science for 11 years, I have a degree in political science and I can assure you that what is happening right now in AMERICA is .....FASCISM! Both LEFT AND RIGHT ARE LEFT!

U.N. 'Climate Change' Plan Would Likely Shift Trillions to Form New World Economy Friday, March 27, 2009 By George Russell Print A United Nations document on "climate change" that will be distributed to a major environmental conclave next week envisions a huge reordering of the world economy, likely involving trillions of dollars in wealth transfer, millions of job losses and gains, new taxes, industrial relocations, new tariffs and subsidies, and complicated payments for greenhouse gas abatement schemes and carbon taxes — all under the supervision of the world body. Those and other results are blandly discussed in a discretely worded United Nations "information note" on potential consequences of the measures that industrialized countries will likely have to take to implement the Copenhagen Accord, the successor to the Kyoto Treaty, after it is negotiated and signed by December 2009. The Obama administration has said it supports the treaty process if, in the words of a U.S. State Department spokesman, it can come up with an "effective framework" for dealing with global warming. The 16-page note, obtained by FOX News, will be distributed to participants at a mammoth negotiating session that starts on March 29 in Bonn, Germany, the first of three sessions intended to hammer out the actual commitments involved in the new deal. In the stultifying language that is normal for important U.N. conclaves, the negotiators are known as the "Ad Hoc Working Group On Further Commitments For Annex I Parties Under the Kyoto Protocol." Yet the consequences of their negotiations, if enacted, would be nothing short of world-changing. Getting that deal done has become the United Nations' highest priority, and the Bonn meeting is seen as a critical step along the path to what the U.N. calls an "ambitious and effective international response to climate change," which is intended to culminate at the later gathering in Copenhagen. Just how ambitious the U.N.'s goals are can be seen, but only dimly, in the note obtained by FOX News, which offers in sparse detail both positive and negative consequences of the tools that industrial nations will most likely use to enforce the greenhouse gas reduction targets. The paper makes no effort to calculate the magnitude of the costs and disruption involved, but despite the discreet presentation, makes clear that they will reverberate across the entire global economic system. Among the tools that are considered are the cap-and-trade system for controlling carbon emissions that has been espoused by the Obama administration; "carbon taxes" on imported fuels and energy-intensive goods and industries, including airline transportation; and lower subsidies for those same goods, as well as new or higher subsidies for goods that are considered "environmentally sound." Other tools are referred to only vaguely, including "energy policy reform," which the report indicates could affect "large-scale transportation infrastructure such as roads, rail and airports." When it comes to the results of such reform, the note says only that it could have "positive consequences for alternative transportation providers and producers of alternative fuels." In the same bland manner, the note informs negotiators without going into details that cap-and-trade schemes "may induce some industrial relocation" to "less regulated host countries." Cap-and-trade functions by creating decreasing numbers of pollution-emission permits to be traded by industrial users, and thus pay more for each unit of carbon-based pollution, a market-driven system that aims to drive manufacturers toward less polluting technologies. The note adds only that industrial relocation "would involve negative consequences for the implementing country, which loses employment and investment." But at the same time it "would involve indeterminate consequences for the countries that would host the relocated industries." There are also entirely new kinds of tariffs and trade protectionist barriers such as those termed in the note as "border carbon adjustment"— which, the note says, can impose "a levy on imported goods equal to that which would have been imposed had they been produced domestically" under more strict environmental regimes. Another form of "adjustment" would require exporters to "buy [carbon] offsets at the border equal to that which the producer would have been forced to purchase had the good been produced domestically." The impact of both schemes, the note says, "would be functionally equivalent to an increased tariff: decreased market share for covered foreign producers." (There is no definition in the report of who, exactly, is "foreign.") The note adds that "If they were implemented fairly, such schemes would leave trade and investment patterns unchanged." Nothing is said about the consequences if such fairness was not achieved. Indeed, only rarely does the "information note" attempt to inform readers in dollar terms of the impact of "spillover effects" from the potential policy changes it discusses. In a brief mention of consumer subsidies for fossil fuels, the note remarks that such subsidies in advanced economies exceed $60 billion a year, while they exceed $90 billion a year in developing economies." But calculations of the impact of tariffs, offsets, or other subsidies is rare. In a reference to the impact of declining oil exports, the report says that Saudi Arabia has determined the loss to its economy at between $100 billion and $200 billion by 2030, but said nothing about other oil exporters. One reason for the lack of detail, the note indicates, is that impact would vary widely depending on the nature and scope of the policies adopted (and, although the note does not mention it, on the severity of the greenhouse reduction targets). But even when it does hazard a guess at specific impacts, the report seems curiously hazy. A "climate change levy on aviation" for example, is described as having undetermined "negative impacts on exporters of goods that rely on air transport, such as cut flowers and premium perishable produce," as well as "tourism services." But no mention is made in the note of the impact on the aerospace industry, an industry that had revenues in 2008 of $208 billion in the U.S. alone, or the losses the levy would impose on airlines for ordinary passenger transportation. (Global commercial airline revenues in 2008 were about $530 billion, and were already forecast to drop to an estimated $467 billion this year.) In other cases, as when discussing the "increased costs of traditional exports" under a new environmental regime, the report confines itself to terse description. Changes in standards and labeling for exported goods, for example, "may demand costly changes to the production process." If subsidies and tariffs affect exports, the note says, the "economic and social consequences of dampening their viability may, for some countries and sectors, be significant." Much depends, of course, on the extent to which harsher or more lenient greenhouse gas reduction targets demand more or less drastic policies for their achievement. And, precisely because the Bonn meeting is a stage for negotiating those targets, the note is silent. Instead it suggests that more bureaucratic work is needed "to deepen the understanding of the full nature and scale of such impacts." But outside the Bonn process, other experts have been much more blunt about the draconian nature of the measures they deem necessary to make "effective" greenhouse gas reductions. In an influential but highly controversial paper called "Key Elements of a Global Deal on Climate Change," British economist Nicholas Lord Stern, formerly a high British Treasury official, has declared that industrial economies would need to cut their per capita carbon dioxide emissions by "at least 80% by 2050," while the biggest economies, like the U.S.'s, would have to make cuts of 90 percent. Stern also calls for "immediate and binding" reduction targets for developed nations of 20 percent to 40 percent by 2020. To meet Stern's 2050 goals, he says, among other things, "most of the world's electricity production will need to have been decarbonized."

Basically what you are saying is because a school is SINGLE A automatically means that the player can't possibly be as good as a Double A or Triple A player. How can you back that up?!?! I can see where a team might be better but to argue that a player may not be that good because they are from a single A school is not in line with reality. Furthermore, in the boys award, even if you are correct and past winners were better, how does this diminish the award? You take the best at the present time and you include them in the the ceremony and the committe picks a winner. Don't take anything away from the Palmer kid because he won, your reasoning seems flawed. But despite the fact that I disagree with you, I do respect your comments, I just don't agree with them.

Hey Lance, That is exactly what is going to happen, OUR STANDARD OF LIVING WILL BE LOWERED, the govt. is in the process right now of doing this. Tim Gehtneir, Treasury Sec., recently said that he would support such a measure if necessary, of course the day before he said he was opposed to it. It may not be a global currency that LOOKS THE SAME in every country, but it will all be backed by the same principals, and it looks like the new principals will be, CARBON. Basically, the wealthier countries ie(U.S., U.K, Japan, Australia, Russia etc.) will take a hit and finance the poorer countries. Ironically enough the Chinese will be included with the poorer more underdeveloped countries and therefore will be granted more CARBON credits so that they can hurriedly catch up with the rest of the world much the same way a country like GUAM OR ZIMBABWE would be permitted. All of this while WE FOOT THE BILL FOR IT!

Oh great....... The president, IL DUCE, will jump all over this........NWO here we come!

Dont' get me wrong I DO NOT THINK FOR ONE MINUTE that President Obama will start doing the things that Hitler, Stalin and Lenin did in their respective countries, regarding hate, concentration camps, genocide, ethnic persecution, etc. HOwever, I do believe that he and his administration are conducting themselves straight from the Fascism playbook in regards to social programs, statist ideology and the merging of corporations and govt.

I know what you are saying there Dave, my point is this ; I am NO LONGER A REPUBLICAN, the last 8 years has been eye opening to me, BOTH SIDES not just the Obama Administration, are destroying the country, and if "W" was still in office pulling this crap along with the rest of the Repubs I would be saying the same thing. I think it is very scary when the so called conservative party gets only 14 NAY votes for this bill..................... I AM A CONSERVATIVE INDEPENDENT WHICH SUPPORTS "SOME" LIBERTARIAN IDEAS.

ANTI=AMERICAN????????????????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! This is how liberalism works, I AM AN AMERICAN, there is a thing called FREE SPEECH! FREE SPEECH, FREE SPEECH, FREE SPEECH! It is NOT ANTI=AMERICAN to say what you think, IT IS AMERICAN TO SAY WHAT YOU THINK! It is ANTI=AMERICAN to tell someone that they cannot say what they think! You have proven to be anything but American by suggesting otherwise. Stop and listen to what you are saying...... This is not the United States of the Offended .........It is the United States of America! I don't want your VERSION of America, I enjoy the one our founding fathers established. One based on FREE SPEECH, FREE IDEAS, FREE THOUGHT!!!! What I say may not be popular, but the CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES (You know that thing that the politicians in Washington D.C. are trying to destroy) guarantees me that what I say does not have to be popular and I have the right to speak my mind, petty words do not bring a nation down, but someone preventing those words sure as HECK CAN BRING IT TO IT'S KNEES! Sir Oliver Wendell Holmes once said "the right to swing my fist ends where the other mans nose begins." My words are not ANTI-AMERICAN and they sure as heck are not physically violating someone elses rights!

At least somebody seems to get it............... March 26, 2009 Bachmann bill would ban global currency @ 1:31 pm by Eric Zimmermann Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-MN) has introduced legislation that would "bar the dollar from being replace by any foreign currency." A statement from Bachmann's website: “Yesterday, during a Financial Services Committee hearing, I asked Secretary Geithner if he would denounce efforts to move towards a global currency and he answered unequivocally that he would," said Bachmann. "And President Obama gave the nation the same assurances. But just a day later, Secretary Geithner has left the option on the table. I want to know which it is. The American people deserve to know." On Monday, Geithner and Bernanke both rejected the idea of a global currency in Congressional testimony. But in remarks to the Council on Foreign Relations yesterday, Geithner indicated he was open to the idea. ////// Geithner and the GANG (The Govt.) are now trying to clean up a mess that OVERREGULATION and FORCED RULES BY THE GOVT. caused.

It's a thing called FREE SPEECH. IF you disagree I respect your opinions, I guess it would have been just fine had this been "W." The reason I used the term FUHRER is to draw attention to the post and the fact that America is becoming more and more FASCIST everyday. Contrary to popular opinion we are not becoming Communist Russia, this administration is looking eerily like Il Duce's Italy! I don't think for one minute that Obama is going to start ethnic, racial or any other type of cleansing. But I can promise you this much, IF YOU ARE A CONSERVATIVE, or have a dissenting opinion of the president and his administration there will not be too many places that you will be welcome under this regime. In order to be more acurate I will now refer to the president as IL DUCE! After all Mussolini was a much nicer guy, not too mention very charismatic! ///////// On a rather interesting note, the liberal LEFT embraced the policies of Mussolini during the early 1920's and 30's it wasn't until the NAZIS started imposing the anti-semitism on Italy that he became unpopular with the AMERICAN LEFT. Therefore, to suggest that FASCISM IS A MOVEMENT of the RIGHT is absolutely an incorrect observation and needs to be re-evaluated. Fascism comes from the LEFT, ask any Political Scientist and they will have to agree!

I understand your thinking that calling him FUHRER is a little overboard, but he has taken this page right out of MEIN KEMPF, this is classical Fascism, similiar measures were imposed by Mussolini. I am not saying for one minute that the President is a NAZI, I am simply using the term FUHRER (the leader) to draw attention to his NATIONAL SOCIALISTIC tendencies. Sure the guy is a SOCIALIST but what many fail to remember is that FASCISM is SOCIALISM. It is a STATIST brand of SOCIALISM. By having young Americans FORCED into this program, they will become INDOCTRINATED BY THIS ADMINISTRATION and therefore, gain further support at the POLLS for their twisted IDEOLOGY. This is only the beginning..........................

Hey, Remember when the East Germans collaborated with the Stasi and informed on their own citizens during the cold war, GET READY HERE WE GO AGAIN! If this isn't bad enough the FUHR....ER.......PRESIDENT AND HIS Admin. are now going to FORCE AMERICANS TO BE CHARITABLE! Obama’s Chief of Staff, Rahm Emanuel, publicly stated his intention to help create “universal civil defense training†in 2006. In an interview with Ben Smith of the New York Daily News, Emanuel outlined the agenda for military-style training, essentially a domestic draft, aimed at preparing Americans for a chemical or biological terrorist attack. Asked by Smith about the universal service plan and whether people would have to live in military barracks, Emanuel laughed before responding, “We’re going to have universal civil defense training, somewhere between the ages of 18 to 25 you will do three months of training….but there can be nothing wrong with all Americans having a joint similar experience of what we call civil defense training or civil service in service of the country, in preparation, which will give people a sense of what it means to be an American.†“It will be a common experience and we will be prepared, God forbid, God forbid that there is a chemical hit, another terrorist act or natural disaster becoming more frequent - there’ll be a body of citizens who are ready and capable and trained - that’s all you have to think about,†said Emanuel before smugly declaring, “We’re all here for you OK? It’s a circle of love.†Asked if the training would be military style, with people wearing uniforms, Emanuel stated, “If you’re worried about are you going to have to do 50 jumping jacks the answer is yes,†adding that the service could be done through state national guard. Shockingly, the GIVE legislation also contains language that could completely demolish the 1st amendment. The 12th amendment to the act states, “Amendment to prohibit organizations from attempting to influence legislation; organize or engage in protests, petitions, boycotts, or strikes; and assist, promote, or deter union organizing.†As Gary Wood writes, “Those in support of this legislation will argue this amendment is limited in scope and is not meant to interfere with the rights of citizens to protest, petition, boycott, or strike in resistance to government proposed laws. However, the people associated through service under the GIVE Act are considered volunteers, still free citizens, yet it will be unlawful for them to take part in any protests against any legislation. This is as close to a sedition act, a violation of 1st Amendment rights, as has been proposed in recent history. A basic right as a part of our natural, inalienable rights, is to resist government. Our founders not only knew it was a right but it was a responsibility. This legislation begins to break that down significantly.†Fears about Obama’s plans to create involuntary servitude and domestic spy squads were first stoked in July 2008, when Obama told a rally in Colorado Springs, “We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we’ve set. We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that is just as powerful, just as strong, just as well funded.†Despite denials that Obama plans to institute a mandatory program of national service, his original change.gov website stated that Americans would be “required†to complete “50 hours of community service in middle school and high school and 100 hours of community service in college every yearâ€. The text was only later changed to state that Americans would be “encouraged†to undertake such programs. Numerous other national service bills have been introduced which target everyone from schoolchildren to the elderly. They include the Service For All Ages Initiative, the Summer of Service Act, the Semester of Service Act, the Encore Service Act and the ACTION Act. Regarding the GIVE Act, “The bill’s opponents — and there are only a few in Congress — say it could cram ideology down the throats of young “volunteers,†many of whom could be forced into service since the bill creates a “Congressional Commission on Civic Service,†reports Fox. “We contribute our time and money under no government coercion on a scale the rest of the world doesn’t emulate and probably can’t imagine,†said Luke Sheahan, contributing editor for the Family Security Foundation. “The idea that government should order its people to perform acts of charity is contrary to the idea of charity and it removes the responsibility for charity from the people to the government, destroying private initiative.†Lee Cary of the conservative American Thinker warns that Obama’s agenda is to, “tap into the already active volunteerism of millions of Americans and recruit them to become cogs in a gigantic government machine grinding out his social re-engineering agenda.†The passage of such shocking legislation with barely a whimper from political activist groups goes to show how well the corporate media has performed in camouflaging the legislation with flowery characterizations of helpful volunteerism, when in reality the bill creates the pretext for mandatory national service and the creation of a multi-million man domestic civil defense unit who will be tasked with spying on their fellow Americans under the justification of protecting the country from terrorism.

This article isn't saying that the ACLU is alleging that there is a CFZ it is confirming the percentage of persons that live in the ALREADY EXISTING CFZ. The Patriot Act brough the CFZ into existence, it is very real and has been for some time now. It is organized and has been established through the Department of Homeland Security. By the way, I DON'T TRUST THE ACLU further than I can throw them, but they are somewhat acurate on this story............of course their reason for hating this idea and mine are totally different. Some links about the CFZ http://ragebot.com/?p=1327 http://nationalexpositor.com/News/1447.html http://www.naturalnews.com/024734.html http://www.firearmstalk.com/forums/f13/do-you-live-constitution-free-zone-11803/ http://en.wordpress.com/tag/constitution-free-zone/

//Not sure how many of you are aware of the CFZ (Constitutional Free Zone) but it does exist and below is a short article about a professor who claims to have been targeted for his anti-fence stance. I personally do not agree with him and his position, but this is America and he deserves the right to express his opinioin without persecution.//////' STORY This past summer, Craig Johnson joined dozens of other activists in a San Diego-area park to protest the expansion of a fence along the US-Mexico border. An associate professor at Point Loma Nazarene University, Johnson says he took his two children, aged 8 and 10, to Border Field State Park in Imperial Beach in June. Scores of border patrol agents were on the scene, Johnson said, and some were recording license plate numbers from protesters' cars parked a more than a mile away from the border. It seems that Johnson's participation in the anti-fence demonstration may have landed him on a government watch list that has inhibited his ability to travel freely between the US and Mexico. A professor of Music, Johnson said he traveled to Tijuana about a week after the protest; upon returning to the US, Johnson says he was handcuffed and arrested by customs agents after a listing associated with his name pegged him as armed and dangerous. "I was thoroughly and aggressively searched. ... Every inch and crack and crevice of my body was poked and prodded," Johnson said. "I was in complete bewilderment of what was going on; I felt violated and frankly was embarrassed." Prior to that visit, Johnson said he had traveled regularly between the US and Mexico for a variety of reasons without facing any harassment. After the June visit, Johnson said he did not cross the border again until October, when he decided to go simply to see whether he could re-enter the country easily. He was subjected to the same harassment. "It took me four months to return to Mexico," he said. "Not because I'm afraid of traveling outside my own country, but rather because I'm afraid of returning home." Johnson spoke Wednesday at a gathering organized by the American Civil Liberties Union, which is highlighting the extent to which the Department of Homeland Security is expanding the authority it claims at US border crossings to infringe upon Americans rights. The ACLU says a "Constitution-free zone" exists within 100 miles of the US border, where DHS claims the authority to stop, search and detain anyone for any reason. Nearly two-thirds of the US population lives within 100 miles of the border, according to the ACLU, and the border zone encompasses scores of major metropolitan areas and even entire states.

I wasn't surprised either by the fact that AIG was spreading the money out, however the average citizen IS NOT aware of this due to a lack of media coverage, information etc and therefore, when a few media outlets started exposing this truth, the DIVERSION TOOK PLACE.

BOTH parites are HIPOCRITES they complain and whine when one party does something and then turns around and perform the same actions. The OBAMA REICH will be one that historians will label as the one THAT "Changed" AMERICA FOREVER!