cavs92 10 Report Share Posted September 22, 2005 according to the g-man's site here are the numbers between 2001-2004: CC: 20 home games 13 - 7 .650 difference .300 23 road games 8 - 15 .350 Tazewell: 21 home games 10 - 11 .476 difference .376 20 road games 5 - 15 .376 Richlands: 24 home games 20 - 4 .833 difference .181 23 road games 15 - 8 .652 Grundy: 24 home games 19 - 5 .792 difference .84 24 road games 17 - 7 .708 Graham: 30 home games 22 - 8 .733 difference .51 22 road games 15 - 7 .682 so as you see tazewell has the biggest difference between home and road winning %. and let me respond to you comment BIGD4VT about that 10 - 2 team coming out of nowhere 1st off that team was 0 - 10 two years before becasue they had 8 10th graders starting on both side of the football and only 2 12th graders on the whole team and they worked thier butts off to win 5 games the next year as 11th graders and then the hard work paid off for those kids thier senior year by going 10 - 2 and would have to the state semifinails that year if thier stsring qb from the year before would have been injured before the season and lost his whole senior year of football. in 2003 they where the second best team in the SWD and would have beat grundy, tazewell, and richlands on the road. Oh yea lance in the game against richlands in 2003 CC had the football on the richlands 2 yardline when CC got called for a personal foul that was a bullcrap call so the score would have been worse. as as for teams coming from nowhere to be good the next couple of years just look throught all of the swd schools and a bet you will find a that every team in the swd has had a down year becuase of youth or coaching and came back to be very good the next couple of years just look at graham in 2000 - 2001 they went from 5 - 6 to 12 - 2 in just 1 year and than again in in 1988 - 1989 they went from 3-7 to 13-1 and state champs in just one year Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rhsfan88 22 Report Share Posted September 22, 2005 [ QUOTE ] Tazewell: 21 home games 10 - 11 .476 difference .376 20 road games 5 - 15 .376 so as you see tazewell has the biggest difference between home and road winning %. [/ QUOTE ] Lets see .476 - .376= A difference of .376. I'm pretty sure that would only be a .100% difference between the two, so it seems to me that Carroll by far has the biggest drop from home win percentage to road win percentage. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cavs92 10 Author Report Share Posted September 22, 2005 my fault 5-15 is a .100 winning % with a difference of .376 sorry type o tazewell does have the highest difference Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
parsons 178 Report Share Posted September 22, 2005 thats a .250 winning percentage Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
parsons 178 Report Share Posted September 22, 2005 a .226 difference Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rhsfan88 22 Report Share Posted September 22, 2005 Which means Carroll still has the highest difference. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cavs92 10 Author Report Share Posted September 22, 2005 my fault CC does have the highest difference i told youi had proof Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cityofRaven 2,457 Report Share Posted September 22, 2005 thanks, you proved all of us....Right! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigD4VT 11 Report Share Posted September 22, 2005 When I ran the original numbers that I posted in the other thread I excluded 2001 because Carroll (as I pointed out) was 0-10 that year. My point was to show that Carroll INSTANTLY started a GOD LIKE home winning streak while maintaining a subpar percentage on the road. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lance 228 Report Share Posted September 22, 2005 yeah the whole point was that it all of the sudden just started right after you guys went 0-10... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goalie 10 Report Share Posted September 23, 2005 it was b/c we had a lot of 10th and 9th graders starting on that team. and it lead to experionce and that leads to wins. and thats y we did good and the season we went 10-2 we had our starting QB out that season. we might have done better with him who knows? oh by the way that QBs name is Matt Hall Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LegendatLegion 109 Report Share Posted September 23, 2005 I think it is a lot more important how competitive a team is in a losing year, as well as how young. If you're playing a lot of freshmen and sophs and they go 2-8 and then go 10-2 then that isn't a big deal from a good program. Just shows they put in the effort and desired not to lose the next year. GC did it in '98 and hasn't looked back since. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goalie 10 Report Share Posted September 23, 2005 and a nother thing that changed from that 0-10 season to now is one Coach Hale. he could be ONE of the best coachs to ever coach at carroll im just say One b/c our feild is named after Frake Beemers coach Tommy Tompson. he has us in the weight room all the time and on the track. hes really changed the work ethics at carroll country for every sport. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
star 10 Report Share Posted September 23, 2005 the refs. didn't hurt any either .....did they? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zach 10 Report Share Posted September 23, 2005 [ QUOTE ] according to the g-man's site here are the numbers between 2001-2004: CC: 20 home games 13 - 7 .650 difference .300 23 road games 8 - 15 .350 Tazewell: 21 home games 10 - 11 .476 difference .376 20 road games 5 - 15 .376 Grundy: 24 home games 19 - 5 .792 difference .84 24 road games 17 - 7 .708 [/ QUOTE ] And tyhose three are home games, so two of the three should be good games Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.01bb665814ffc257795fe158cb2045c7.png.8a531ac878a82772b21014d7a6167582.png){kind=logo}
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.