Actually, before last night they had only attempted like 4-5 passes in the first 2 games combined. Once they fell behind and into the 4th qtr they started passing. I think they threw 1 pass in the 3rd (I think it was 3rd) qtr to Farris for the TD, but it was a screen so the TD should be credited moreso as a run than pass. Their passing game wasn't bad but Reed sure wants to run the ball. It's not Sturgill, but he wasn't bad. Hard to break away from the run game for 3.5 qtrs and jump into shotgun and pass. Little late to find a rhythm. It was necessary in an effort to win, but just wish Reed wouldve thrown a little more mid-game to open the running up some. I think what Pulaski did was just tackle anybody coming across the LOS from the backfield and hopefully one of them had the ball. And much more often than not, that worked. If AHS wants any success as the year progresses they are going to have to develop a passing game. I don't mean Sturgill-esque.....just enough the keep defenses honest. JMO. Not to take anything away from Pulaski, but they weren't anything special...nobody with lightning speed, QB was so-so...he missed a ton of wide open receivers, kicking game better than average, decent sized Dline. I truly think AHS had a better than average chance to win last night. Pulaski staff did a great job adjusting and AHS didn't adjust anything until, like I said earlier, into the 4th when they started passing a bit. Abingdon defense did a very good job the first couple of series but then Pulaski started passing and they opened their playbook a little bit. AHS has what appears to be a 5 play playbook. Well, 10 plays if you count both sides. Lol.