BigBlueAlum 12 Report Share Posted October 23, 2007 [ QUOTE ] Good audio for the most part. I did find it funny how they kept portraying Richlands, in the little I listened to, as this huge underdog. At one point, one of the guys said he talked with someone that thought Bluefield could score 60 against Richlands. Who did he talk to, a crack head or a drunken moron? I mean give me a break. I was confident Bluefield would win, but I knew they'd be lucky to score more than 21 points against a good Richlands defense. The people predicting a blowout were simply people running off at the mouth. [/ QUOTE ] Here are some of the predicitons from the Richalnds-Bluefield prediciton thread last week... beavers 42 blues 14 Bluefield 35-14. Bluefield 36 Richlands 14 Bluefield 38 Richlands 14 BHS 35 RHS 14 BHS 42 RHS 14 I wonder were they got the Richlands was the huge underdog? All of the predicitons were made by different people from Tazewell, Graham, and Bluefield (maybe a few other place, but Im not sure) I think when peolple are predicting a team to win by three touchdowns then the other team would be considered an underdog. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluefield_Rules 46 Report Share Posted October 23, 2007 [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Good audio for the most part. I did find it funny how they kept portraying Richlands, in the little I listened to, as this huge underdog. At one point, one of the guys said he talked with someone that thought Bluefield could score 60 against Richlands. Who did he talk to, a crack head or a drunken moron? I mean give me a break. I was confident Bluefield would win, but I knew they'd be lucky to score more than 21 points against a good Richlands defense. The people predicting a blowout were simply people running off at the mouth. [/ QUOTE ] Here are some of the predicitons from the Richalnds-Bluefield prediciton thread last week... beavers 42 blues 14 Bluefield 35-14. Bluefield 36 Richlands 14 Bluefield 38 Richlands 14 BHS 35 RHS 14 BHS 42 RHS 14 I wonder were they got the Richlands was the huge underdog? All of the predicitons were made by different people from Tazewell, Graham, and Bluefield (maybe a few other place, but Im not sure) I think when peolple are predicting a team to win by three touchdowns then the other team would be considered an underdog. [/ QUOTE ] Just b/c Joe Blow off the street predicts a blowout doesn't mean one should be expected. I'm flattered though that Richlands considered themselves such huge underdogs against Bluefield. Many in Bluefield didn't though, most expected a close, hard fought game... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigBlueAlum 12 Report Share Posted October 23, 2007 [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Good audio for the most part. I did find it funny how they kept portraying Richlands, in the little I listened to, as this huge underdog. At one point, one of the guys said he talked with someone that thought Bluefield could score 60 against Richlands. Who did he talk to, a crack head or a drunken moron? I mean give me a break. I was confident Bluefield would win, but I knew they'd be lucky to score more than 21 points against a good Richlands defense. The people predicting a blowout were simply people running off at the mouth. [/ QUOTE ] Here are some of the predicitons from the Richalnds-Bluefield prediciton thread last week... beavers 42 blues 14 Bluefield 35-14. Bluefield 36 Richlands 14 Bluefield 38 Richlands 14 BHS 35 RHS 14 BHS 42 RHS 14 I wonder were they got the Richlands was the huge underdog? All of the predicitons were made by different people from Tazewell, Graham, and Bluefield (maybe a few other place, but Im not sure) I think when peolple are predicting a team to win by three touchdowns then the other team would be considered an underdog. [/ QUOTE ] Just b/c Joe Blow off the street predicts a blowout doesn't mean one should be expected. I'm flattered though that Richlands considered themselves such huge underdogs against Bluefield. Many in Bluefield didn't though, most expected a close, hard fought game... [/ QUOTE ] They may have, but from a lot of the predictions I read, it seemed like just as many people xcpected Bluefield to win big. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Willie 10 Report Share Posted October 23, 2007 QUOTE: William Campbell is the best team Bluefield will play this year. ------------------------- Does this mean Richlands is a better team then WC.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sources 10 Author Report Share Posted October 23, 2007 [ QUOTE ] QUOTE: William Campbell is the best team Bluefield will play this year. ------------------------- Does this mean Richlands is a better team then WC.... [/ QUOTE ] I cannot answer that but I can tell you that both are better than James Monroe. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Willie 10 Report Share Posted October 23, 2007 QUOTE: I cannot answer that but I can tell you that both are better than James Monroe. ------------------ I guess I'll just have to consider the SOURCE.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tom 10 Report Share Posted October 23, 2007 haha, BURNN!!!!!! one for SOURCES!! lmao! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gomavs 10 Report Share Posted October 23, 2007 [ QUOTE ] QUOTE: I cannot answer that but I can tell you that both are better than James Monroe. ------------------ I guess I'll just have to consider the SOURCE.... [/ QUOTE ] Sources could be right. Afterall, he has seen a lot of James Monroe football this year (he's been attending Maverick games all season incognito). Plus he's seen their schedule and from it he gets many visions and can make many readings (just like from tea leaves!!). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluefield_Rules 46 Report Share Posted October 23, 2007 [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Good audio for the most part. I did find it funny how they kept portraying Richlands, in the little I listened to, as this huge underdog. At one point, one of the guys said he talked with someone that thought Bluefield could score 60 against Richlands. Who did he talk to, a crack head or a drunken moron? I mean give me a break. I was confident Bluefield would win, but I knew they'd be lucky to score more than 21 points against a good Richlands defense. The people predicting a blowout were simply people running off at the mouth. [/ QUOTE ] Here are some of the predicitons from the Richalnds-Bluefield prediciton thread last week... beavers 42 blues 14 Bluefield 35-14. Bluefield 36 Richlands 14 Bluefield 38 Richlands 14 BHS 35 RHS 14 BHS 42 RHS 14 I wonder were they got the Richlands was the huge underdog? All of the predicitons were made by different people from Tazewell, Graham, and Bluefield (maybe a few other place, but Im not sure) I think when peolple are predicting a team to win by three touchdowns then the other team would be considered an underdog. [/ QUOTE ] Just b/c Joe Blow off the street predicts a blowout doesn't mean one should be expected. I'm flattered though that Richlands considered themselves such huge underdogs against Bluefield. Many in Bluefield didn't though, most expected a close, hard fought game... [/ QUOTE ] They may have, but from a lot of the predictions I read, it seemed like just as many people xcpected Bluefield to win big. [/ QUOTE ] I went back and checked the Bluefield/Richlands predictions thread and the Pick'em thread from last week. Out of all the Bluefield fans that post here only TWO picked Bluefield to win by more than 10 points. If you re-read the BLU/R'lands prediction thread you'll find that most of the Bluefield fans expected the game to be close and hard fought throughout. Most of the outragous predictions were from people associated with neither school, most of which were least informed about the game b/c their respective school wasn't involved. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sources 10 Author Report Share Posted October 23, 2007 If you've seen one James Monroe team, you've seen them all. Weak schedule - check Archaic Single Wing offense - check Top seed in playoffs - check Early exit from playoffs - check No state title or state title game appearance - check Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gomavs 10 Report Share Posted October 23, 2007 [ QUOTE ] If you've seen one James Monroe team, you've seen them all. Weak schedule - check Archaic Single Wing offense - check Top seed in playoffs - check Early exit from playoffs - check No state title or state title game appearance - check [/ QUOTE ] You're a real jerk. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GMan 3,569 Report Share Posted October 24, 2007 [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] If you've seen one James Monroe team, you've seen them all. Weak schedule - check Archaic Single Wing offense - check Top seed in playoffs - check Early exit from playoffs - check No state title or state title game appearance - check [/ QUOTE ] You're a real jerk. [/ QUOTE ] Wait a sec...I thought I was "THE JERK" on this board...I second Sources' statement...its all FACT... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluefieldRocks 14 Report Share Posted October 24, 2007 Well technically, GMan is the main "Jerk" on this board. I dont think sources can say that he's a wanted man on 2 two websites and 2 countys! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BHSnuffsaid 10 Report Share Posted October 24, 2007 [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] If you've seen one James Monroe team, you've seen them all. Weak schedule - check Archaic Single Wing offense - check Top seed in playoffs - check Early exit from playoffs - check No state title or state title game appearance - check [/ QUOTE ] You're a real jerk. [/ QUOTE ] Wait a sec...I thought I was "THE JERK" on this board...I second Sources' statement...its all FACT... [/ QUOTE ] GMan is mos def the biggest, meanest jerk on here. and i hate him, but love when he's talking about somebody else keep up the trash GMAN, you make school worth while! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BLU 10 Report Share Posted October 24, 2007 His check list is VERY accurate!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Willie 10 Report Share Posted October 25, 2007 QUOTE: If you've seen one James Monroe team, you've seen them all. Weak schedule - check Archaic Single Wing offense - check Top seed in playoffs - check Early exit from playoffs - check No state title or state title game appearance - check ------------------------ Bluefield went out before JM did last year - check Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GMan 3,569 Report Share Posted October 25, 2007 [ QUOTE ] QUOTE: If you've seen one James Monroe team, you've seen them all. Weak schedule - check Archaic Single Wing offense - check Top seed in playoffs - check Early exit from playoffs - check No state title or state title game appearance - check ------------------------ Bluefield went out before JM did last year - check [/ QUOTE ] True, however, you both lost to the same team by the same amount...the only difference is Bluefield lost to a team seeded higher than them, JM lost to a team seeded lower than them...underachievers... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wvmedic7 10 Report Share Posted October 25, 2007 [ QUOTE ] Did I see Bluefield running out on the field to celebrate? I didn't think you was supposed to do that.... ---------------------------------------------------- You saw about 30 students from bluefield rushing the field. My rushing the field days are over...haven't rushed since Weir in '04 ! [/ QUOTE ] I thought the scene in your sig. picture looked familiar. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hokie07 11 Report Share Posted October 25, 2007 No, the entire stadium was on the field after the Weir game! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluefieldRocks 14 Report Share Posted October 25, 2007 Another difference in the game between tolsia and bluefield vs. James Monroe Tolsia was we played at there sloppy field and you guys had them at home and still couldnt finish them off Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wvmedic7 10 Report Share Posted October 25, 2007 [ QUOTE ] No, the entire stadium was on the field after the Weir game! [/ QUOTE ] oh yeah, I remember. I was there too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BEAVERTAIL Report Share Posted October 25, 2007 [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] No, the entire stadium was on the field after the Weir game! [/ QUOTE ] oh yeah, I remember. I was there too. [/ QUOTE ] did you rush the field as well? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bogeavers 10 Report Share Posted October 25, 2007 [ QUOTE ] QUOTE: If you've seen one James Monroe team, you've seen them all. Weak schedule - check Archaic Single Wing offense - check Top seed in playoffs - check Early exit from playoffs - check No state title or state title game appearance - check ------------------------ Bluefield went out before JM did last year - check [/ QUOTE ] Yall lost because you missed an extra point. I solved your problem. I was at the Bluefield-v-JM basketball game up there last year. This kid got dunked on or something pathetic, and he kicked the ball out of anger and it traveled all the way to the other baseline! Maybe you should recruit him to the football team, because we all know the level of your kicker's play. Wait...you all do have a kicker right? Or do you somehow kick it out of that ancient offense. I bet you all do drop kicks don't ya. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WaveFan09 50 Report Share Posted October 25, 2007 wow...i was just listening to the 4th quarter on must of have been a bad spot for richlands the other guy is like...thats horrible officiating must of have snuck in a ref from WV Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluefield_Rules 46 Report Share Posted October 25, 2007 [ QUOTE ] wow...i was just listening to the 4th quarter on must of have been a bad spot for richlands the other guy is like...thats horrible officiating must of have snuck in a ref from WV [/ QUOTE ] Both set of radio announcers seemed to really overblow the officiating, making it look awful the opposite way. Here's a thought, call what you see on the field and keep your mouth shut otherwise. Do these guys not know anything about professionalism? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.01bb665814ffc257795fe158cb2045c7.png.8a531ac878a82772b21014d7a6167582.png){kind=logo}
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.