(1) Trump’s comments at the Helsinki Conference don’t even come remotely close to meeting the definition of “treason” under 18 U.S.C. 2381. That argument is legally fraudulent.
(2) That tweet from December 2, 2017 (a) alludes not one iota to obstruction of justice, and relies upon some “moon landing hoax” level conspiracy to tie it back to anything resembling obstruction of justice, and (b) was arguably not even written by Trump.
(3) You’re relying on fiscal investments by China into organizations which Trump constitutionally must have no financial stake.
(4) Questioning the militant ANTIFA does NOT equal Nazi sympathy. He has roundly condemned Nazis in the strongest of terms, over and over again.
(5) Why would a man worth $9,000,000,000 need campaign funds to pay off Stormy Daniels? That sub-Mendoza Level Logic.
I could go on, but you might need to make a trip back to Occupy Democrats or some other liberal cesspool to find some more softballs for me to knock out of the park.